A student interviewing principals about their experiences with disruptive students would likely conduct which type of review?

In the context of research involving human subjects, particularly when a student is interviewing principals about their experiences with disruptive students, a full board review is often necessary. This type of review is typically required for studies that pose more than minimal risk to participants or involve vulnerable populations.

The implications of interviewing school principals about disruptive student behavior can raise various ethical considerations, including confidentiality, the potential for revealing sensitive information, and the impact of the interviews on both the participants and the students discussed. These concerns necessitate a thorough evaluation by a full institutional review board (IRB) to ensure that the research is conducted ethically and responsibly.

A full board review engages multiple reviewers who can assess the proposed methods, risks, and benefits of the study in detail. It helps to protect the rights and welfare of participants, making it the most appropriate choice in scenarios where the research context may include sensitive topics or vulnerable populations, such as students and their teachers or administrators discussing potential behavioral issues.